![]() ![]() Newspapers have closed or been downsized, broadcasters have cut their more expensive (and more labor-intensive) content. In the rush to return to the once-rich profit margins of the early 2000s, media organizations are being urged by their shareholders to dispense with expensive ventures like international reporting. Freelancers are being hired while experienced, older journalists are laid off. It comes from freelancers, citizen journalists, bloggers and vloggers. Increasingly, content isn’t created by journalists once employed by legacy media. There’s a video service called YouTube.There’s a food delivery service called Foodora.We have a lodging system called Airbnb.And that future for newspapers, they said, is digital, digital and more digital. ![]() In February in Toronto, at a gathering sponsored by the Canadian Journalism Foundation, three prominent newspaper publishers (Montreal’s La Presse, the Toronto Globe and Mail and the Toronto Star) discussed the future of the business. It has enlarged our informational possibilities while at the same time offering up trivia like cat videos, celebrity sightings and “listicles.” It is, in effect, driving journalistic deviance downward, to paraphrase Daniel Patrick Moynihan. As ratings and circulation declined, media organizations, pressured by shareholders and desperate to find a way to return to the great profit margins of the 1980s, seized on digital as the silver bullet of transformations.īut if ever there was a double-edged sword, it is the digital culture. It emerged in the late 1990s and early 2000s and swept through every aspect of modern life, including journalism. They cling to digital like a torpedoed sailor clings to a raft, hoping that the submarine won’t hit them again. Yet media organizations stubbornly insist that digital is the solution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |